Their destinies will lead them on different fronts. Navy) and comrade Dimitri Petrenko’s (Red Army) destinies are intermixed in the missions. Right now, it’s the best WWII shooter we’ve played, largely because it’s got a solid (if unoriginal) single player, some spectacular multiplayer, and oh yeah: because it’s brutal as hell.This Call of Duty opus portrays the horror of the Second World War during the fifteen missions of the single player campaign. Soldier Miller (U.S. It isn’t a revolution in Call of Duty gaming, but neither is it a step backwards, like some have claimed. The single-player isn’t as compelling as Modern Warfare but it’s still worth playing nonetheless the best part though is that there’s a deep and satisfying multiplayer component waiting for you when you’re done.Īll in all World at War delivers. But with the new co-op play and the rest of the multiplayer content, World of War turns out to be an extremely entertaining and faithful addition to the Call of Duty family. It’s certainly not the bar-raiser that “Modern Combat” was, especially in the solo campaigns. Play with friends and allies in the new cooperative gameplay mode, where you can team up with up to two players on the same console or four players online for the first time!.Take the excitement to the next level with a multiplayer experience featuring a ranking system that brings out your competitive side!.Experience warfare from the World War II era and use a wide variety of weapons and technology.Immerse yourself in open-ended campaigns that give you more freedom to complete objectives.Call of Duty: World at War brings more exciting themes than the previous games in the series. Get ready for some intense action in a first-person shooter set in the Pacific and Eastern Front theaters of World War II.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |